An nameless Substack submit printed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “a whole bunch of consumers they have been compliant” with privateness and safety laws, doubtlessly exposing these clients to “legal legal responsibility underneath HIPAA and hefty fines underneath GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final 12 months introduced elevating a $32 million Sequence A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations on its weblog, calling the Substack submit “deceptive” and saying it “comprises plenty of inaccurate claims.”
The Substack submit is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an e-mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer studies.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured clients in a subsequent e-mail that they have been in compliance and that no exterior occasion gained entry to delicate information, DeepDelver mentioned they and different clients had turn out to be suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was happening, we determined to pool sources and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing faux proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp studies, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling shoppers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering clients with “fabricated proof of board conferences, checks, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these clients to “select between adopting faux proof or performing largely guide work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that just about all of Delve’s shoppers appear to have gone by means of two audit companies, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the USA.
These companies, they mentioned, are simply rubber-stamping studies that have been generated by Delve. Consequently, DeepDelver mentioned the startup “inverts” the traditional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, check procedures, and ultimate studies earlier than any impartial evaluation happens, Delve locations itself within the position of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates all the attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its clients, DeepDelver mentioned the startup helps these clients “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that comprise safety measures that have been by no means applied.”
DeepDelver mentioned that whereas their firm was discussing its points with Delve, the startup “despatched us a number of bins of donuts […] to maintain us comfortable.” Nonetheless, DeepDelver’s employer supposedly unpublished its belief web page and not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t difficulty compliance studies in any respect. As a substitute, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then gives auditors with entry to that data.
“Last studies and opinions are issued solely by impartial, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate mentioned.
Delve additionally mentioned that its clients “can decide to work with an auditor of their selecting or decide to work with one from Delve’s community of impartial, accredited third-party audit companies.” These auditors, the startup mentioned, are “established companies used broadly throughout the trade, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering clients with “faux proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates usually are not the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,’” the corporate mentioned.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
Following the preliminary Substack submit, an X person named James Zhou mentioned they have been in a position to achieve entry to delicate data from Delve, comparable to worker background checks and fairness vesting schedules. Dvuln founder Jamieson O’Reilly shared extra particulars from what O’Reilly mentioned was a dialog with Zhou about “a number of gaping safety holes in Delve’s exterior assault floor.”
TechCrunch despatched an e-mail searching for further remark to the media contact deal with listed on Delve’s web site. The e-mail bounced, however I subsequently acquired a calendar invite for a “Delve demo” later this week. TechCrunch has additionally reached out to DeepDelver for added remark.
This submit has been up to date with further details about purported safety vulnerabilities supplied by Jamieson O’Reilly, and extra particulars about Delve’s response to TechCrunch.
